Moderator: Rusty Russell,
Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Rusty Russell, Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Before ARPANET and apple, if you wanted data associated
with scientific objects stored at various museums and universities around
the country, your options may have included Ato
fly or to drive.@
Today, users of the information superhighway can get downright cranky if
the data they desire is not available electronically. This level of expectation
suggests how successfully we=ve
embraced the digital era, but what does it portend of the future of the
objects themselves? Are specimen conservation and specimen data projects
competing for the same resources? Can we ever provide enough data to make
the objects superfluous? This paper explored these questions more fully
while providing numerous real-life examples of both happiness and heartache
at the object-data nexus.
Allison R. Brigham, Supervisory Biologist,
USGS, Denver, CO
John Kingston, Biologist, USGS, Denver,
CO
The USGS has had to expand its initial concept of collections being merely property management (a few old portraits and memorabilia at Headquarters; some rocks and cores maintained as Aworking@ collections by geologists) to encompass a realization that some of its programs produce biological specimens that must be archived and made available to the scientific community. It=s been a shock to some! We provide the national taxonomic QA/QC for the biological sampling programs (algae, benthic invertebrates, fish) within the Water Resources Division of the USGS. Although there is no complete diatom flora for North America, the web pages of algae (complete with digital images and other taxonomic information) that we have developed from our collections throughout the US function as continuously updated, working flora. This is presently available in-house and will soon be accessible publicly. Examples using our American fish data illustrate innovative, Auser-friendly@ methods of accessing taxonomic, site-specific and biogeographic data in text- and map-based, searchable, downloadable formats. These were developed to fulfill, in part, the responsibilities USGS has with regard to FOIA.
David R.B. Stockwell, University of California,
San Diego, CA
Julian Humphries, University of New Orleans,
New Orleans, LA
Sandra Turner, Allison R. Brigham, and John
C. Kingston, USGS National Water Quality
Laboratory, Arvada,
CO
We provide the national taxonomic quality assurance/quality control for a continental-scale biological sampling program (algae, benthic invertebrates, fish) within the Water Resources Division of the USGS. Although there is no diatom flora for North America, the web pages of algae (complete with digital images and other taxonomic information) that we have developed from our collections throughout the U.S. function as a continuously updated, working flora. This is presently available in-house and will soon be accessible publicly. Examples using our North American fish data illustrate innovative, Auser-friendly@ methods of accessing taxonomic, site-specific and biogeographic data in text- and map-based, searchable, downloadable formats. These were developed to fulfill, in part, the responsibilities USGS has with regard to freedom of information.