STATEMENT OF Daniel N. Wenk, Acting Director, National Park
Service, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
NATIONAL PARKS OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONCERNING
H.R. 2430, TO DIRECT the Secretary of
the Interior to continue stocking fish in certain lakes in the North Cascades
National Park, Ross Lake National Recreation Area, and Lake Chelan National
Recreation Area.
July 22, 2009
![]()
Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to provide
the Department of the Interior’s views on H.R. 2430, a bill to direct the
Secretary of the Interior to continue stocking fish in certain lakes in North
Cascades National Park, Ross Lake National Recreation Area, and Lake Chelan
National Recreation Area (hereafter referred to as “North Cascades Complex”).
The Department does
not oppose H.R. 2430; however we would like to work with the committee on
amendments to the bill.
The National Park
Service collectively manages
The 2006 Management Policies of the
National Park Service (NPS) allow for the management of fish populations when
necessary to restore resources to their natural state or reestablish a native
species that has been extirpated. Stocking of other plants or animals is also
allowed under certain circumstances.
Specifically, the policies provide that “In some special situations,
the Secretary may stock native or exotic animals for recreational harvesting
purposes, but only when such stocking will not unacceptably impact park natural
resources or processes and when:
·
the
stocking is of fish into constructed large reservoirs or other significantly
altered large water bodies and the purpose is to provide for recreational
fishing; or
·
the
intent for stocking is a treaty right or expressed in statute, applicable law,
or a House or Senate report accompanying a statute.
The Service will not stock waters that are
naturally barren of harvested aquatic species.”
The NPS appreciates
the collaborative partnership with the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW) at North Cascades Complex and throughout the State of
A decade of research,
conducted in the North Cascades Complex through
In 2002, the NPS in
collaboration with WDFW began development of a comprehensive Mountain Lakes
Fishery Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (Plan/EIS). The purpose of the planning effort was to
apply the results of the research and resolve the longstanding conflict over
fish stocking in the mountain lakes.
On November 26, 2008, the
NPS issued a Record of Decision for the final Plan/EIS and selected the
preferred alternative that would stop stocking and remove fish from lakes where
significant impacts were occurring (49 lakes) but allow stocking of
non-reproducing fish at low densities to continue in up to 42 lakes, subject to
additional monitoring. In this manner, the EIS found that the stocking would
not unacceptably impact park natural resources or processes in some lakes. However,
the Record of Decision (ROD) also notes that fish stocking in the Stephen T.
Mather Wilderness does not meet the minimum requirements analysis conducted
under section 4(c) of the Wilderness Act.
In addition, the ROD recognizes that to be consistent with NPS policy, the
NPS would need the legal authority to implement the preferred alternative. The ROD further provides and that if the
legal authority was not provided to the NPS by July 1, 2009, the NPS,
consistent with NPS policy, would discontinue the stocking program in its
entirety and work to restore the natural ecology of all the mountain
lakes. In the majority of lakes this would be
accomplished through the combination of not stocking and continued
fishing. Over time, natural mortality
would remove the remainder. In lakes where
naturally reproducing populations were found, the NPS would work to remove these
fish. Realistically at least ten lakes
are so large that no known removal techniques will work and fish populations
will remain for the foreseeable future.
The NPS is interested
in ensuring that any legislation regarding fish stocking is guided by science
and an understanding of the impact that such policy decisions would have on
park resources. We recommend, for
example, that any stocked fish be both native to the local watershed and be
functionally sterile. And we request
that the Secretary continue a program of monitoring the impacts of fish
stocking in order to determine if further adjustments are needed to protect
aquatic resources. We would welcome an
opportunity to work with the Committee and
the sponsors of this
legislation on the language of these proposed amendments.
Mr. Chairman, this
concludes my prepared remarks. I would be pleased to answer any questions you
or other members of the Subcommittee may have.