Opportunities for Federally Associated Collections
November 18-20, 1998
San Diego, CA

red line to separate text

Notes from the Closing Penary Session
November 20, 1998

Working Smarter

  1. Controlling Costs of Collections Management
    Agencies need to standardize the elements included in reporting curation costs; being specific regarding list of what is reported.

  2. Professional Responsibilities
    It is the responsibility of the agency to define requirements, including consequences for lack of compliance.
    Incentives for compliance are also generated by public interest and benefits.
    Next Steps:

  3. Repository Accreditation
    Review of repositories is needed.
    Everyone must recognize the differences among disciplines.
    There is a need for an alternative to AAM standards to prevent redundancy in complying with accreditation standards.

  4. Records and Information Management (combined with databases discussion # 14)
    People who generate collections need to be aware of archival issues.
    Original records should be archived; electronic media provide access but are not an acceptable substitute for original records.

  5. Native American Consultation
    Involve Native Americans early in process, including education, outreach, web site development, and financial assistance.

    Contacts: Theresa Spears Pechanga, Cheryl Jeffrey (San Diego Museum of Man); Ruben Sandoval, Reid Nelson, Mary McNeil (Department of Agriculture; mary.mcneil@usda.gov); Sue Thorsen, (sue_thorsen@nps.gov); Myra Giesen (mgiesen@do.usbr.gov); Kirsten Collins (kscollins@efdswest.navfac.navy.mil); Ophelin Cruz; Nancy Pearson (npearson@gp.usbr.gov); Karen Benally (Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Dept.; roadprog@cyberport.com).



  6. Native American Access to Collections
    Access should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.
    Both sides need to recognize constraints to access. Contacts: sue_thorsen@nps.gov

     

    Convincing Others
  7. Funding
    Organizations should explore the creation of endowment funds permitted to finance federal oversight. Contacts: lawr.v.salo@usace.army.mil, rebecca.j.otto@usace.army.mil, Ron May (tivella1@aol.com) sue_thorsen@nps.gov, nick_valentine@fws.gov

    What should happen next? Who should be involved?--Trust Banker


  8. Education/Marketing Contacts: Wilfred Wellington, Gila River Indian Community, Beth Padon (bpadon@aol.com),


  9. Increasing Access
    Access is a shared responsibility with federal funding and non-federal institutional work.
    Web use needs to increase for electronic access. Actions: Contact:janne002@tc.umn.edu


  10. Clarifying Ownership
    The federal government is responsible for broadly defining ownership. Contacts: Theresa Spears Luiseno, celler@nv.blm.gov


  11. Standards

    36 CFR 79 is not flexible or comprehensive enough.



    Adjusting the Rules

  12. Legislation
    A comprehensive strategy is needed regarding cost recovery for public services.
    Individual agencies need more staff.
    There needs to be a multi-agency group. Contacts: lawr.v.salo@usace.army.mil (funding), cary.norman@nhc.navy.mil(pay for services), Les Jensen, Army Center for Military History (legislation to protect Federal historical collections), Marian Hansson (202-208-2532).


  13. Deaccessioning
    36 CFR 79 needs to address this topic.
    There needs to be more federal/AAM coordination. Contact: Terry Childs (terry_childs@nps.gov)


  14. Databases
    Individual needs hinder database standardization.
    Each discipline requires discipline-specific solutions.
    There needs to be a museum computer network, with federal coordination. Contacts: Andrean Lain, New York State Museum (alain@mail.nysed.gov) David Stockwell (davids@sdsc.edu), wendy_bustard@nps.gov, Kathy Cande, Arkansas Archeological Survey (kcande@uark.edu),barbaram@sosmail.state.mi.us, mldonald@uarizoda.edu, asmith@lacma.org, Ron May (tivella@aol.com)


  15. Permits
    Permits are not standardized among the agencies, especially involving scientific applications and reports.
    There is much redundancy regarding the Reinvention of Government.
    There should be an interagency working group.
    Communicate the value of work to agencies and law enforcers. Actions:
    1. Explore new NPS natural history collecting permit to all feds -- Knight
    2. Contact other organizations (ASC, Registrars, etc.) to see if they would be willing to disseminate draft permits for comment.
    3. SPNHC meeting--commitment for at least a day on 1999 program
    4. Disseminate info to group members
    5. Fact Gathering -U.S. Attorney's office; Management authority Fish and Wildlife--templates, use, and gaps
    6. Track progress of OMP (FWS) permit review (T. McIntyre)

    Contacts: betty_knight@nps.gov, bright.cheryl@nmnh.si.edu, shelton.sally@nmnh.si.edu, jbrown@sel.barc.usda.gov, nick_valentine@fws.gov, thomas.mcintyre@noaa.gov, Eugenia Apkaw (P.O. Box 361, Sacaton, AZ 85247), Paula Liken (602-644-3422)

    Other Notes

    red line to separate text
    San Diego Conference
    Preconference Workshops Opening Roundtable 1 Opening Roundtable 2 Opening Roundtable 3
    Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 Session 5
    Session 6 Session 7 Session 8 Session 9 Session 10
    Session 11 Session 12 Session 13 Closing Plenary Conference Statistics
    Berkeley 1996 San Diego 1998 Austin 2000
    Federal Collections home page

    red line to separate text

    To the Interior Museum Program home page
    URL: http://museums.doi.gov/fedcoll/fedcoll2/sess1.html
    For comments related to this page, please contact Museum_Services@nbc.gov
    Last modified on December 29, 1999